National Civic League Winter 2026 National Civic Review Explores the Future of Local Democracy

​The National Civic League’s Winter 2026 National Civic Review examines how local democracy is evolving amid declining trust, polarization, and rapid technological change. The issue highlights bridging institutions, dialogue models in divided schools, redesigns of local government to prioritize equity and participation, and community foundations’ role in sustaining engagement. It also considers AI’s promise and risks, lessons from anti-corruption socialist mayors, and reflections on governance reforms in Portland. The publication advances participatory democracy by sharing innovations and equipping practitioners to foster inclusive, responsive local governance.

---

---

The National Civic League has released the Winter 2026 edition of the National Civic Review, examining how local democracy is being reshaped in response to declining trust, deepening divisions, and rapid technological change. This quarterly publication, which has promoted civic engagement and effective local governance for over a century, brings together practitioners, scholars, and civic leaders exploring what democracy actually looks like on the ground today. The winter issue features contributions on the role of community foundations in facilitating engagement, new models of local governance prioritizing diversity and resident participation, bridging institutions working to restore civic capacity in polarized environments, and emerging implications of artificial intelligence for democratic decision-making. Together, these pieces highlight evolving practices, leadership approaches, and cultural forces shaping more inclusive, responsive, and resilient communities at the local level.

The issue includes practical case studies and theoretical frameworks addressing urgent challenges facing American communities. Martín Carcasson and Willow Paul examine the critical role of bridging institutions in building community capacity during toxic political times, arguing that reimagining engagement in cities and towns can demonstrate to Americans that productive collaboration across differences remains possible and even enjoyable. Melinda Burrell, D.G. Mawn, and Becca Kearl present a new model for facilitating conversations in divided school communities, emphasizing vulnerability, listening, and willingness to change as foundations for restoring civic trust. Nick Vlahos proposes redesigning local government beyond traditional council-manager and mayor-council structures to center resident participation and equity in governance. Nancy Van Milligen explores community foundations' distinct advantages for facilitating engagement, including local knowledge, accountability, and continuity that enable sustained democratic participation.

The National Civic Review serves as essential reading for dialogue and deliberation practitioners working to strengthen local democracy amid polarization and institutional distrust. Matt Leighninger's contribution addresses how artificial intelligence could enable continuous, sophisticated collaboration between citizens and governments while posing significant threats to democratic governance that communities are only beginning to understand. The issue also includes an interview with Michael Jordan, former Portland City Administrator, reflecting on challenges of enacting dramatic structural changes in city government, and historical perspective on socialist mayors who built civic trust through corruption-fighting and improved services. By documenting both innovations and cautionary lessons from communities nationwide, the publication supports practitioners in adapting democratic practices to contemporary challenges while maintaining commitment to equity, inclusion, and collaborative problem-solving.
​
To read the Winter 2026 edition of the National Civic Review, visit https://www.nationalcivicleague.org/ncr-online/